Doe No. 1 v. United States
Appeals case (11th Cir. 2021) where the Eleventh Circuit initially affirmed Marra's decision but then ruled en banc that the CVRA did not create a right for victims to sue when no indictment was filed.
Connection Graph
Top 10 connections · Full graph →
Mutual Connections
Entities connected to Doe No. 1 v. United States through shared intermediaries, but not directly linked.
Connected via: U.S. Southern District of New York, Kenneth Marra, Non-prosecution agreement (Epstein) +5 more
Connected via: U.S. Southern District of New York, Non-prosecution Agreement (2007/2008), Non-prosecution agreement (Epstein) +3 more
Connected via: U.S. Southern District of New York, Kenneth Marra, Rene Alexander Acosta +3 more
Connected via: Kenneth Marra, Non-prosecution agreement (Epstein), Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 +2 more
Connected via: Kenneth Marra, Non-prosecution agreement (Epstein), Paul G. Cassell +2 more
Key Relationships
Connected To
- Organization U.S. Southern District of New York - The Supreme Court decided in February 2022 to let the Eleventh Circuit's final judgment stand without reviewing the c... Court Record
- Person Kenneth Marra - Judge Marra presided over the case and ruled on February 21, 2019 that the CVRA did apply and victims should have bee... Court Record
- Person Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 - Two of Epstein's victims filed this federal lawsuit in 2008 seeking to vacate the non-prosecution agreement for viola... Court Record
- Organization Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals - The Eleventh Circuit initially affirmed Marra's decision but later ruled en banc that the CVRA did not create a right... Court Record
Mentioned In
- Person Kenneth Marra - Judge Marra presided over the lawsuit challenging the non-prosecution agreement on CVRA grounds. Court Record
- Document Non-prosecution Agreement (2007/2008) - The lawsuit filed by two of Epstein's victims sought to vacate the federal non-prosecution agreement on the grounds t... Court Record
- Document Non-prosecution agreement (Epstein) - Federal lawsuit filed to vacate the non-prosecution agreement on grounds it violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act Court Record
- Person Rene Alexander Acosta - The 2008 federal lawsuit filed by victims challenged Acosta's non-prosecution agreement for violating the Crime Victi... Court Record
- Person Paul G. Cassell - Cassell represented the victims who filed the lawsuit challenging the non-prosecution agreement. Court Record
- Person Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 - Jane Doe #1 was one of two Epstein victims who filed a federal lawsuit in 2008 to vacate the non-prosecution agreement. Court Record
- Person Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 - Jane Doe #2 was a plaintiff in the federal lawsuit challenging the non-prosecution agreement Court Record
- Document Epstein non-prosecution agreement - The 2008 lawsuit filed by Epstein's victims aimed to vacate the non-prosecution agreement on grounds it violated the ... Court Record
- Organization Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals - The Eleventh Circuit initially affirmed Marra's CVRA ruling but later reversed it en banc, finding victims could not ... Court Record
- Document Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) - Lawsuit filed by Epstein's victims aimed to vacate the non-prosecution agreement on grounds that it violated the CVRA. Court Record
Represented By
- Person Paul G. Cassell - Cassell represented Epstein's victims in litigation challenging the plea deal Credible Reporting
Testified In
- Person Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 - Jane Doe #2 was one of two Epstein victims who filed a federal lawsuit in 2008 challenging the non-prosecution agreem... Court Record
Charged With
- Document Epstein non-prosecution agreement - The lawsuit sought to vacate the non-prosecution agreement on CVRA grounds. Court Record
Source Documents & Evidence
“The Eleventh Circuit affirmed Marra's decision, but then sitting en banc revisited that decision and ruled otherwise, in Doe No. 1 v. United States, 749 F. 3rd 999 (11th Cir. 2021) and in February 2022 the Roberts Supreme Court decided to let that...”Accessed: 2026-05-07
- 📄https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21039003-giuffre-v-andrew/
- 📖https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_G._Cassell
<iframe src="https://epsteinindex.us.com/embed/document-doe-no-1-v-united-states" width="400" height="200"></iframe>