United States v. Annabi
6
Connections
1
Sources
1
Quality /10
2
Entity Types
Second Circuit precedent case applied by the court to determine scope of Epstein's NPA
Connection Graph
Top 5 connections · Full graph →
Mutual Connections
Entities connected to United States v. Annabi through shared intermediaries, but not directly linked.
Person
Ghislaine Maxwell
Connected via: U.S. Southern District of New York, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Epstein non-prosecution agreement
Person
Kenneth Marra
Connected via: U.S. Southern District of New York, Epstein non-prosecution agreement
Person
Judge Kenneth Marra
Connected via: U.S. Southern District of New York, Epstein non-prosecution agreement
Person
Rene Alexander Acosta
Connected via: U.S. Southern District of New York, Epstein non-prosecution agreement
Person
Paul G. Cassell
Connected via: U.S. Southern District of New York, Epstein non-prosecution agreement
Key Relationships
Mentioned In
- Document United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir. 2024) - The Second Circuit applied the Annabi precedent in rejecting Maxwell's NPA argument Court Record
- Document United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir. 2024) - The Maxwell court applied the Annabi precedent to interpret the NPA's scope Court Record
- Organization U.S. Southern District of New York - Second Circuit applied Annabi precedent in rejecting Maxwell's NPA-based immunity argument Court Record
- Organization United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - The Second Circuit applied Annabi precedent in deciding Maxwell's appeal regarding the scope of the NPA Court Record
- Document Maxwell v. United States, 118 F.4th 256 - The Maxwell decision applied the Annabi precedent regarding interpretation of plea agreements. Court Record
- Document Epstein non-prosecution agreement - Annabi precedent was applied to interpret whether Epstein's NPA bound other U.S. Attorney's offices Court Record
Source Documents & Evidence
“The court applied Annabi even though the NPA had been negotiated in the Eleventh Circuit where no similar precedent exists or applies...Ordinary principles of contract interpretation compel Annabi and Maxwell to be reversed”Accessed: 2026-03-01
Added: 2026-03-01
· Updated: 2026-03-31
Embed this entity ·
<iframe src="https://epsteinindex.us.com/embed/document-united-states-v-annabi" width="400" height="200"></iframe>